22 yards

All triggered during a conversation over coffee, discussing about the days when we could watch at least 3 days of the five day game in full after taking a day extra off, or a lucky holiday coming up. Ironic to this, the reason for writing this is quote from a great player in another game. Juan Roman Riquelme retired yesterday, and he was quoted by FIFA.com as “I was lucky enough to grow up during Maradona’s heyday. After we’d see a game of his, my friends and I would run out onto our street for a kickabout. When I had possession, I’d say things like ‘It’s Maradona on the ball’. Nowadays, my son says the same thing, but he’s always Messi when he goes to shoot. For people of my generation, Maradona was the ultimate idol. For the kids today, like my boy, that idol is Messi.”

During my discussion, I told my friends that once the match finished at 4:45 or so, we would skip all the refreshments and rush out to play. This was during the time period 1994-1997. I might be hardly 5 foot tall, but I used to rush and bowl like Waqar! The guys whom I used to play with was older by 4-5 years! I had to beat them to get consecutive 2-3 overs in a 12 over match. Now after watching the match so closely, and all the balls bowled replaying in mind like clockwork, it was easy to replay that. Like Riquelme said, I would say things to myself like, "Now I am gonna swing it in!"

This is not just my experience. We had a lot of fun discussing the days when we could watch a game for fun. The most bizarre of experience was narrated by another friend. I was telling how power never used to go during the match and then he said, "Oh, you need to hear this then. During my school days, there was a crucial India Pakistan match but I don't remember when it was exactly. Mind you, these were the days before mobile phone and all. Just half an hour before the match, the power goes off. Everyone is down. Then my uncle called up a neighbor house which is 3-4 kilometer away and asks whether they have power. They had, but they didn't have a TV. He immediately called us and told to take the antenna down while he took the TV. We took the TV and antenna to that house and fixed it before match. Once after the entire match was over, we took it down back to our house."

We Indians have a craze for games - some might say it is only cricket, just say that to a Bengali or Malayali. For that matter, we Malayalis are craziest lot. We can be crazy for even basketball (Have you ever watched a inter-collegiate game. The crazy commentary on DD-Malayalam! Presentation, UC College etc are just a few of the names which I can remember.)

Harsha Bhogle on Rahul Dravid

Rahul Dravid batted exactly like the person he is: stately and upright, dignity and poise his two shoulders, standing up to everything coming at him with minimum fuss. He picked his shots carefully, almost like he was weighing the risk for fear of letting himself and his side down. There was little about him that was flamboyant - there isn't with an oak - and patiently, brick by brick, he built giant edifices. He is a good man and he batted like a good man.

And like with most of his choices in life, he has chosen well again. He has not craved a full house on its feet, there has been no grandstanding. The retirement is a sports-page event not a gossip item. He knew it was time. "I'm sure you have thought it through," I said when he called. "I know this is the time," he said. "Any longer and it will be for the wrong reason." I expected nothing less from a man it has been my privilege to watch and to know for 16 years.

It was but a feather that prevented him from getting a century on debut at Lord's. He would have liked it, for he has this sense of history about him. He would have wanted to be on that honours board, and 15 years later he inscribed his name there with a Dravid special. They love him there like he is one of their own, and indeed England has been a recurring motif in his life. The 1999 World Cup; the majesty of 2002, when he outbatted the world and produced one of his finest innings in Leeds; winning a series as captain in 2007; and then those three centuries last year that reminded us once again what Test cricket was all about.

At Lord's he remained not out from No. 3; at Trent Bridge he opened the batting and was ninth out; and at The Oval, at the age of 38, he had but ten minutes between deliveries as he batted through the innings for six and a half hours, before returning to open the batting. A standing ovation had just died down before another took its place. I stood too, not for the first time.

And he loved to explore England, on foot, in buses and in trains; always asking about the latest musical and offering extended reviews of those he had seen. One such exploration took him to Scotland, from where he returned humbler, if that was indeed possible. He was getting paid to play, he said, but everyone else was paying to play - taking unpaid leave, shutting down shops, all for the sheer joy of playing. He learnt, he said, how much you can take for granted as an international star. I can see why he will continue to be a giver, why his doors will be open for other cricketers. And I hope they learn from him never to say no.

There were two things Dravid didn't really love in cricket: opening the batting and keeping wicket. He was asked to do both at various times, and I asked him if he ever contemplated saying no. He didn't enjoy it, he said, but took it as a challenge, to see how good he could be. This acceptance of challenges is what has defined his cricket and made him one of the finest team players there has been. A challenge, he said, allowed him to understand himself better, it gave him a reason to play sport. If he shied away, he would never know how good he could be. He kept wicket in about 70 one-day internationals, never most convincingly, but he allowed himself to look bad for the team to look good. It was always the team for him and in the little piece he wrote for the book that my wife Anita and I did, he quoted Kipling: for the strength of the wolf is the pack and the strength of the pack is the wolf. It was nice to see a cricketer quoting from literature.

 

It is away that the most memorable innings were played; in New Zealand in 1999, England in 2002, Australia and Pakistan in 2003-04, and in the West Indies in 2006. To that extent, he was the true successor to Sunil Gavaskar

 

The team is like a pot, Dravid often says. Some put in and some take out. The more who put in, the fuller it gets, and those were the players he enjoyedplaying with the most: those who put into the pot. He was one of the leading contributors and there was never an effort at gaining sympathy or media attention for it. He gave quietly. He was one of the reasons why India recovered so quickly from the match-fixing issue around the turn of the century. India had some outstanding men of integrity at the time. Tendulkar, Dravid, Kumble, Ganguly, Laxman and Srinath. It was a good group to belong to.

The turn of the century was also the coming of age of Dravid as an international cricketer. He had proved people wrong about his ability to play one-day cricket at the World Cup but then went to Australia convinced he needed to do well there to gain respect. It is a word he will often use in conversation ("the respect in your dressing room and that of your opponents is what matters") but in quest of it that time, he tried too hard, cocooning himself into a mass of nervous energy. He struggled but returned in 2003, at the height of his powers as a batsman, to peel off a double-century in Adelaide that won India a famous Test.

He scored many in that phase, most of them away and throughout his career, his home and away averages have sat close together. It is the mark of a genuinely great player. And it is away that the most memorable innings were played: in New Zealand in 1999, England in 2002, Australia and Pakistan in 2003-04, and in the West Indies in 2006. To that extent he was the true successor to Sunil Gavaskar.

And his father will be proud of that. Oh, we family folk are suckers for that kind of sentiment. In 1994, when I used to do the highlights of domestic cricket for ESPN, Dravid's father would often call to ask if he could get highlights of his son's batting. The request was always very politely made and a thank you was always offered when I met him. You can see the shyness in the genes, the correctness. I don't mention it lightly. In our obsession with saluting the here and now we sometimes ignore what produced success. If Dravid senior was proud of his young man, Rahul was proud enough of his mother to be the photographer when she received her PhD. It might seem a small thing to do but it tells you a lot about the person. Giant edifices are built on solid foundations.

And so it is with a touch of emotion that I will say goodbye to India's finest No. 3. He wasn't the Wall, not for me. Yes, his defence was as perfect as it could get, his steeliness so admirable, but he played shots that warmed the heart. The cover drive, with the big stride forward, and the prettiest of them all - the whip through midwicket played so late and while so nimble on his toes.

He will be missed, as the great always are. He will see his children grow, take them to school, imbibe in them the reading habit (for he read more than most people I know and couldn't understand why others didn't), but from time to time he must tell the new flowers that will inevitably bloom in our cricket of the need to put grit over beauty, team over self, challenge before rejection, humility before arrogance, for that is what he stood for.

Well played, my friend. You have the honour of leaving the game richer with your legacy and none of us can ask for anything more than that.

Source: Cricinfo

Author: Vijeeta Dravid

I've been married to Rahul for almost nine years now and we have always been very private people. So I'm sure he will be astonished to find that I have written at length about him.








I was with the boys at Old Trafford when Rahul played his first (and last) Twenty20 international and then also travelled to every match of the one-day series. After the last ODI, we went into the Lord's dressing room and showed Samit and Anvay theirbaba's name on the honours board. It was a huge thrill for the boys to see Rahul play live in front of so many people, to see him at his "work", which kept him away from them for months.



Cricket has been the centre of Rahul's world and his approach to every season and series has been consistent in all the time we have been married. Methodical, thoughtful and very, very organised. When I travelled with him for the first time, in Australia in 2003-04, I began to notice how he would prepare for games - the importance of routines, and his obsession with shadow practice at odd hours of day or night. I found that weird. Once, I actually thought he was sleepwalking!



Now I know that with Rahul's cricket, nothing is casual, unconscious or accidental. Before he went on tour, I would pack all his other bags, but his cricket kit was sacred - I did not touch it; only he handled it. I know if I packed only two sets of informal clothes, he would rotate them through an entire tour if he had to and not think about it. He has used one type of moisturising cream for 20 years because his skin gets dry. Nothing else. He doesn't care for gadgets, and barely registers brands - of watches, cologne or cars. But if the weight of his bat was off by a gram, he would notice it in an instant and get the problem fixed.



Cricket has been his priority and everyone around him knows that. On match days Rahul wanted his space and his silence. He didn't like being rushed, not for the bus, not to the crease. All he said he needed was ten minutes to himself, to get what I call his "internal milieu" settled, before he could go about a match day.



When we began to travel with the kids - and he loved having them around during a series, even when they were babies - we made sure we got two rooms. The day before every game, the boys were told that their father had to be left alone for a while, and Rahul would go into his room for his meditation and visualisation exercises. On the morning of the game, he would get up and do another session of meditation before leaving for the ground. I have tried meditation myself and I know that the zone he gets into as quickly as he does - it takes lots of years of training to get there. It is part of the complete equilibrium he tries to achieve before getting into a series.



Like all players, Rahul has his superstitions. He doesn't try a new bat out for a series, and puts his right thigh pad on first. Last year before the Lord's Test, he made sure to sit in the same space Tillakaratne Dilshan had occupied in the visitors' dressing room when he scored nearly a double-hundred earlier in the season. Rahul scored his first hundred at Lord's in that game.



Once the game is on, at the end of every day he has this fantastic ability to switch off. He may be thinking about it, his batting may bother him, he will be itching to go back and try again, but he can compartmentalise his life very well. He won't order room service or brood indoors, he would rather go out, find something to do - go to a movie or watch a musical, which he loves. He will walk out to the sea to wind down or go to bookstores, or find something else to do.



He has dealt with all that goes on in cricket because he can separate the game and the rest of his life and put things in perspective. No matter what was happening in his cricket, at home he is husband, father, family man. He has never said, "Oh I've had a bad day." He wouldn't speak about his work unless asked. Other than dropped catches.



Only once, I remember, he returned from a Test and said, "I got a bit angry today. I lost my temper. Shouldn't have done that." He wouldn't say more. Many months later, Viru [Sehwag] told me that he'd actually thrown a chair after a defeat to England in Mumbai. He'd thrown the chair, Viru said, not because the team had lost but because they had lost very badly.



One of Rahul's great strengths is his ability - and he has had it all along - to accept reality. He believes you cannot complain about anything because there is no end to complaining. And he knows there is no end to improving either. He always looks within, to gain, to learn and to keep working at his cricket.
In the last few years he worked doubly hard to make sure he played the game in his best physical condition in the toughest phase of his career physically. 

He tried to understand his body and work on his limitations - he was able to hold off shoulder surgery despite a problem in his rotator cuff because he found ways to keep it strong. When I was pregnant with Samit, we spent two months in South Africa to work in a sports centre that focused on strengthening Rahul's shoulder. Because he sweats profusely, he has even had sweat analysis done, to see how that affects his batting. He found that Pat Rafter, the former Australian tennis player, had a similar problem.



To get fit, he went on very difficult protein diets for three months at a stretch, giving up rice, chapatis and dessert altogether - even though he has a sweet tooth. He wanted his batting and his cricket to benefit from his peak fitness, even heading into his late 30s. He has been to see a specialist in eye co-ordination techniques, for eye exercises for the muscles of his eyes. If there was a problem, he always tried to find answers.



Outside cricket, Rahul is a man of no fuss. If he's on a diet, he will eat whatever is served, as long as it fits the diet. Even if the same food keeps turning up on his plate for days in a row, he will eat it without complaint. If he drops a catch, though, it bothers him enough to talk about it on the phone when we speak in the evening; during matches, it is the only part of cricket that he will talk about without me asking him about it. In 2009 he lost his old, faded India cap, when it was stolen from a ground. He was very, very upset about it. It was dear to him and he was extremely proud to wear it.



People always ask me the reason for Rahul being a "normal" person, despite the fame and the celebrity circus. I think it all began with his middle-class upbringing, of being taught to believe in fundamental values like humility and perspective. He has also had some very old, solid friendships that have kept him rooted.



He is fond of reading, as many know, and has a great sense of and interest in history of all kinds - of the game he plays and also of the lives of some of the world's greatest men. When he started his cricket career, he had a coach, Keki Tarapore, who probably taught him to be a good human being along with being a good cricketer.



All of this has given Rahul a deep understanding of what exactly was important about his being in cricket and what was not. It can only come from a real love for the game. When I began to understand the kind of politics there are in the game, he only said one thing: that this game has given me so much in life that I will never be bitter. There is so much to be thankful for, no matter what else happens, that never goes away.



Cricket has made Rahul who he is, and I can say that he was able to get the absolute maximum out of his abilities as an international cricketer.



What next for him? I know he likes his routine and he's in a good zone when he is in his routine, so we will have to create one at home for him. Getting the groceries could be part of that. A cup of tea in the morning for his wife would be a lovely bonus, I would think, particularly now that he doesn't have to take off for the gym or for training at the KSCA at the crack of dawn.



More seriously, though, I think he will spend time relaxing and reading to let it all sink in a bit. He has loved music and wants to learn how to play the guitar. Then perhaps he would like to find something that fills in at least some of the place that cricket occupied in his life, something challenging and cerebral.


Rahul has lived his dream and he thinks it's time to move on. Retirement will mean a big shift in his life, of not have training or team-mates around him, or the chance to compete against the best. The family, though, is delighted to have him back.

Don Bradman, 270 vs England, Ashes 3rd Test (1937)

This particular match will go down in the annals of test cricket as one of the most tactical ones of all time. Don Bradman had newly been appointed captain of the Australian team and it seemed to have affected his batting. To give some preface to this match Australia were 2-0 down in the series, losing the first one by 322 runs and the second one by an innings and 22 runs. Bradman had scored two ducks in the previous two tests. Twice had the entire team of Australia been bowled out for a score in the 80s. Voce and Verity were tearing apart the Australian batsmen. Bradman's captaincy and support from the team was being questioned by everyone. In the face of it all Australia started the third test match in a do or die situation. Over 350000 people came in to watch over 5 days which is a record attendance figure to this date.

Australia won the toss and Bradman chose to bat in what were decent batting conditions. But the English bowlers were in relentless form and reduced Australia to 181/6 with Bradman scoring a mere 13 runs. Then it started to rain heavily and play ended for the first day. The second day wet pitch was a torture to bat on. Bradman let the tail wag for 30 minutes and then declared at 200/9 so that the bowlers could take a crack at the English batsmen in the best conditions. England struggled on the wild pitch that many described as the worst they had ever seen. They faltered along to 76/7 when Don Bradman unleashed his first tactical move. He asked his bowlers to not get the batsmen out so fast since that meant they had to face the English bowlers. The next day was a Sunday and a rest day so there was time for the pitch to ease out till Monday.

Bradman was discreet about his motive. He did not want his opposite number Allen to know what he was doing lest he'd declare and send the Aussies in. The English bowlers were confident that no Australian batsman could last more than 10 minutes on that pitch and therefore England finally declared at 76/9 a huge 124 runs short.

Bradman then resorted to wasting a bit of time before he unleashed his second tactical move. He reversed his batting order and sent the tailenders in to bat first. On that pitch your batting skills didn't really matter. You just had to stick in there and leave as many balls as possible. At the end of day 2 Australia had only lost one wicket.

On day 3 the pitch was much better but the English bowlers still posed a huge threat. After sending in more sacrificial batsmen Australia had been reduced to 102/5 and that was when Bradman walked in. Coming in at no 7 he din't have too many partners to bat with, had to face a hungry English bowling attack and the ire of the media which had started calling him a coward for hiding behind tailenders. It also din't help that it kept raining time and again which meant that he had to bat on a wet wicket that he wanted to avoid in the first place. He fell sick too and was down with influenza. Yet he labored on on with inhuman precision and went on to score 270 batting for a total of 7 hours and 38 minutes which was his longest innings. That score essentially pushed England out of the contest and Australia won that test by 365 runs. Such was the effect of that innings that it buoyed the Australians and they went on to win the series 3-2. Bradman scored 212 in the 4th test and 169 in the 5th. This has been the only instance in history where a team that was 2-0 down in a 5 match series went on to win it.

Rahul Dravid took a single off the first  ball of a new spell by Glenn McGrath and watched from the non-striker’s  end as Mohammad Kaif battled for survival over the next five deliveries.

It was October of 2004. The city of oranges was in full bloom,  celebrating the end of a hot summer and licking its lips at the prospect  of a citrusy winter. At the VCA stadium, India,  led by Dravid, was trying to save the “final frontier” on an unusually  green pitch from a marauding Australian team that had already won the  first Test in Bangalore.

Tottering at 75-4 in reply to Australia’s first innings 398, the hosts  had reached a point on the second day of the match where the Kaif-Dravid  partnership was 

the only thing that could, perhaps, save them from  imminent defeat.

At the end of that rare mid-afternoon over from McGrath, the batsmen met  for a conference in the middle of the pitch. “He’s bowling out of his  skin,” Dravid said, and Kaif, having faced five unplayable deliveries,  smiled back in agreement.

“It’s going to be tough,” he continued, “but we have a chance if we can see off this spell. Otherwise it’s all over.”

Kaif said he would do his best, but Dravid told him that he had a better  plan: For the rest of McGrath’s spell, Kaif would stay at the other end  against Warne, while Dravid would take on the might of the Australian  fast bowler playing his 100th Test. 

This, Dravid hastily explained, was not a reflection on Kaif’s calibre  especially since he had been in good form over the last couple of  months. It was just something that he, being the more experienced  player, needed to do at this pivotal moment of the match.

“It’s settled then,” Dravid said, waving away any polite opposition that  Kaif may have had. “No more singles until McGrath is in the attack.  Forget about the scoreboard. You stay put at your end. I will see him  off from this side.”

Dravid scampered across to the business end off the second ball of Warne’s next over and resolutely marked his guard.

Over the next 18 deliveries, McGrath and Dravid were engaged in a kind  of battle that defines Test cricket. McGrath tried everything to entice  Dravid into playing a false stroke, to get him to fish outside off, to  york him, and to take him by surprise with a short ball. Dravid,  stubborn and determined, soaked in the pressure, lunging forward to pat  away deliveries directed at his stumps, and refusing to go near anything  more than an inch outside off.

“It was a spell of bowling that is best watched from the non-striker’s  end,” Kaif said later. “I can’t think of any other batsman who would’ve  volunteered, let alone insisted, to do what Rahul was doing.”

India scored six runs in the next five overs (a two and a four off Kaif’s bat  against Warne) as Dravid cocooned himself from temptation. In the  commentary box, the experts criticised him for going into a shell, for  being over-defensive, for appearing to be clueless against quality  bowling on a seaming track. They didn’t realise that Dravid had assessed  the situation and chosen to face the firing squad alone.

This cat-and-mouse game went on for the next twenty minutes. Two more  overs, Dravid told Kaif at the end of McGrath’s third, and we’ll be home  dry. “He’s starting to get tired now.”

Kaif patted out another maiden, and Dravid negotiated the first five  deliveries of McGrath’s next over without mishap. But McGrath, by now  aware of what was going on, got a ball to leave Dravid ever so slightly,  and kiss the edge before flying straight to Warne in the slip cordon.

The scoreboard recorded an innocuous 140-ball, 173-minute 21 against Dravid’s name. India lost the match two days later.

In the end, it was a small, almost insignificant knock: a tick in the  failures column for a batsman who has succeeded against fiery spells all  over the world. But it showed that he always, unfailingly, even during  his forgotten innings, put the team before himself. More than his  ability, or his records, it was this that made Rahul Dravid special.

I was reading the article that came today in ET. A wonderful piece by Boria Majumdar on MSD. It read "Mahendra Singh Dhoni yet to pass litmus test of Indian captaincy". Now that is a catchy news headline. I started reading it, and these paragraphs struck me as most of my own thoughts. It mixed statistics and viewpoints, and it dragged in old memories to the statistics.

However, in the Test match format, he still has a lot to prove. Just a year-and-a-half earlier, we lost 8 consecutive Test matches away from home, a record that just doesn't go with the man tipped to be the best ever. We also lost a home series against England, which, more than anything else, was acutely disappointing. And Dhoni as a batsman can seriously do much better than what he has done in Test in overseas conditions. It is as if he doesn't like the format and finds it a little too daunting on occasions. It is in this regard that his legacy has to improve significantly.
And it is this poor overseas record that prompts me to bring Sourav Ganguly back into the debate on India's best captain. This debate is regarding Test match cricket and nothing else. Under Sourav, more than anyone else, we learnt to win overseas. Since taking over in 2000, he won us a crucial Test match at Headingley in 2002. India went on to draw that particular series 1-1 against the English.

We followed this up with a runner-up finish in the 2003 world cup winning 8 consecutive matches on South African soil. And then came the absolutely incredible test win at Adelaide. This win meant we drew the 2003-4 series down under 1-1. The honeymoon was complete when India beat Pakistan in Pakistan 2-1 in March-April 2004.

And in the series down under in 2003-4, it was his century in the first Test at the Gabba that set the tone for the contest. It is in key away series that I'd love to see MSD come good. We are playing 14 Test matches overseas between December 2013 and January 2015. Each of these Test matches will need MSD to be at his inspiring best. It is upon MSD to encourage his young brigade and lead from the front. We need a Ganguly like 144 to set the tone and unless that happens, his legacy as the best ever can never be doubtless.

With the advent of T20, it was almost clear that I can be soon boxed up as a relic of the past. I do not say I was a regular player who always played in long form of the game in whatever level I played. No. Far from that, I usually played game with overs of 10, 12, 15, 16 or 20. Now why are these numbers so relevant? We used to play with spells of 2, 3 or max 4 (main) bowlers. Our games were most similar to T20 in all of the big strategy that they hype in the papers. Then why would I consider myself so distant from the shortest version of game?

My school days were mixed versions of listening to elders speaking about the glories of football and watching the excitement of ODI in DD. So far as to regularly play either of these games, I played lagori (7 stones), uppum pakshi (salt and bird??), kallanum police-um (Theif & Police!!) and the usual games of Goli, carroms, ludo &c. The first time I played football, I got hit by a 6" or 7" ball right below my solar plexus. I couldn't breathe for next (4)5 minitues! I switched to the safer game of cricket. Then came the glory days of watching Donald, Waqar, Mike Atherton, Mark Waugh, Akram and Sachin. I was hooked to the long form. Those guys were throwing their all out for batting/bowling a whole day while I could barely manage 4 overs on a trot.

Was it the admiration for those or the lack of ability on my part that made me say that long form is better? Maybe. Though I would say a good player is good in all forms of the game. Then comes the question of statistics. Statistics are never good in a small sample space. At least, this much I have learned in my engineering. A few advantages of learning without experience , and which sometimes pacify my inner urges of going out and bowling damn fast or curling the ball, which I still do in my mind.

When Sourav and Sachin used to win matches for us, with those great opeing partnerships, we used to jump up in glee. We used to say, next world cup is ours. It does not matter if Baichung Bhutia is going to Aston Villa, Sachin is Yorkshire's first overseas player! We may not participate in FIFA world cup, but the next ICC world cup is ours. The "next world cup" had to wait for 3 editions which I faithfully watched and in the end said, again, "next time". We were not so bad in long form. When Ganguly became captain, there was an energy in the team - winning energy! Nobody can say earlier teams lacked energy! Srinath and V(egetarian) Prasad used to spit fire! But we started winning.

In both long form and short form we started winning.

I have stopped watching tests because I have to earn my bread, for which I have to work and my manager doesn't give me leave to watch cricket for 90 hours played in the sun (wherever they are played!). I do not watch ODI's because they are usually slog matches. And when I watch the T20 matches, I do not see flair in strokes nor do I see fire in the balls. I have kept away from the game which had given me so much of proud moments, sad moments, fine moments and all other emotions for a young kid high on sports.

Under Dhoni, I am not finding that winning energy in tests.Is the Captain to blame? So much for the statistics - I would rather say the way he gives youngsters a chance might be the culprit. Ganguly made the team out of youngsters, but he somehow managed to make them perform in winning situations. Dhoni does not seem to get that always right. He might be experimenting too much, but test is not simply given the name like that. That is where you either fail or pass. Anyone who plays 90 over, and comes out good should be trained/mentored. I would say, forget the glams of Kohli in Flying Machine, Jadeja in Reebok, take the players through the hard test of playing the long game. Let the game speak, not the 20-30 clips in Star sports or ESPN.

I hope Dhoni get to like winning in tests as much as he likes to win in other two forms.

Red shiny ball with such beautiful surface that you will always want it to be like that itself. After pitching it in, when it returns back to my hand, I used to, yeah, its in past tense, wipe it clean, put sweat and nicely rub it in my palm. This was eight years back. I still remember it as vividly as yesterday. Maybe that is the reason why I went for the inter BU selection. There was hell lot of players, and not just some casual corporate guys. These were serious players. As expected, the Tamilians were the most enthu guys. It doesn't matter to me. I knew myself as a fast bowler. It turned out like the human robot in Terminator: Salvation. It thinks himself to be human. Truth is – I used to be a fast bowler, and I had never worked on keeping it so.

The truth was ugly, bitter and whatever adjectives that are usually used with this word. I was not bowling fast. I could not even skim the ball. My wrists were paining each time I tried to swing it. I was not tired, but my muscles were not used to this kind of work. They were complaining like Kumbhakarna being woken up in between his sleep. It was not to be as I had hoped. The realization dawned when after almost two overs, my ball was not pitching in right length. I could also find my head was not steady at the time of release. Ah, I should have played more. I had good action, but what is the use without practice. It is said that you don't forget swimming once you learned it. It doesn't hold for cricket. On more consideration, I do not doubt whether football also will be alongside cricket. I should get hold of a ball soon and try it.

- Sept, 06 2010.

Just tweaked here and there, and made a team, just because I did not like the original one and I wanted my own.

1. Sunil Gavaskar

2. Virender Sehwag

3. VVS Laxman

4. S R. Tendulkar

5. Gundappa Vishwanath

6. Kapil Dev

7. Mohinder Amarnath

8. Syed Kirmani

9. Anil Kumble

10. E.Prasanna

11. B.S. Chandrasekhar

And no One Day eleven. Man, I am not interested. What next, Twenty-20 All time XI!

Anyone who haven't read the original, please do. There is a Third list. If you miss it, not even Cric info can give you that knowledge :P